Friday, March 03, 2006

Controversy over cartoon on Prophet Mohammed

Controversy over the cartoon on Prophet Mohammed

There have been scores of insults to religious sentiments in the west. Some like the picture of Hindu deity on the toilet paper, cover, footware, underware, beer bottles etc. There is no limit to such insults. This list is nothing. For a more detailed account, you can go to Hindunet.org and get the whole list on how Hindu gods and goddesses have been shamed in various countries at various times.

I can understand the sentiments that are hurt, even though I don't believe my faith is so weak as to come tumbling down because of such acts born out of ignorance(?). Personally I don't give a damn, probably I will wince once at reports of such stupidity, and move on.

I thought I am being superior in forgiving them. I have been harbouring serious misgivings over that of late in the light of the snowballing row over the Prophet cartoons.

Lets look at the background.

The cartoons appeared in a European country, Denmark. And does not violate any of the laws prevailing there. Yet, look at the protests that are mushrooming across the Indian landscape, from Kashmir to Hyderabad, taking in Uttar Pradesh and other regions on the way.

In the protests in UP, a state where the government could fall at any moment, a five-star hotel was damaged by the protestors. And, in a first of its kind in independent India, a Samajwadi Party minister offered a bounty of Rs 51 crore on the cartoonist's head, plus gold -- which will be raised from the Muslim community.

And now, a Shariat court has ordered the cartoonist's death under Islamic law.

I wonder whether we live in a secular democracy or in some medieval kingdom to our west. I have the deepest sympathies for those offended by the cartoons, as I have for those offended by other similar portrayals. At the same time, they have no right to damage a public property, which has nothing to do with the controversy.

Why is public property in India being damaged over the hurt sentiments, why is the Indian legal process being subverted by extra-official authorities who are issuing edicts? Why is an Indian minister, sworn to uphold the Indian Constitution, abetting murder and why is no action being taken against him?

What exactly is the Indian State's fault in the cartoon controversy? That it is home to the second largest Muslim population in the world, because of which it must be subject to every ebb and flow in the Muslim world?

I have a doubt: when Hindu deities ARE being defiled in many parts of the world, how come Hindus in India, from where the faith originated, never demonstrated although they must number a billion, how come the religious heads did not issue any edict like 'off with his head' etc? In the light of the cartoons row, wouldn't such behaviour have made sense?

Now that I have raised some uncomfortable questions, let me face the inevitable charge that will follow, which a very close friend of mine who never misses an oppurtunity to point finger at me WRONGLY, that I am a Hindu fundamentalist, someone who hates the minority community, and who is so blinded by his prejudice that he cannot digest any such thing.

I have a doubt. What is that Islam does not recognise national boundaries; Muslims all over are one community; what affects them in one corner of the world affects everyone equally...

Let me tell you, the Muslims who are protesting out on the streets, damaging public property, calling for death etc are doing their faith no good; on the contrary, their behaviour only reinforces the stereotype. I wish the community will stop blaming the world at large for its many ills and pause to look within.

The UPA Govt is doing nothing to uphold the constitution, which is supposed to be the highest authority. Rajiv did the same mistake. I have already written about this in my previous blog. He succumbed to the street protests by muslims and banned the Satanic verses. Even after the supreme court gave a verdict for compensation to a muslim woman, he subverted the supreme court in parliment due to the pressures from the muslim community. Who can forget the infamous Shah Bano case. The supreme court got fed up saying that this is what will happen in a secular country like us if we don't have a UCC, which we ought to have had. (Nehru and Patel shud have implemented it while starting the nation building fromt he start.)

In counter these to the hindus, he opened the gates in Ayodya temple for the Shilanyas. In response, the BJP took the Hindu votes and the Mulayam, Laloo, Mayawati and others too the muslims and other votes. BJP came to power because of the congress.

It is doing the same mistake now. Only fools do the same mistake twice. what is the need for us to protest with the Danish government, or for Sonia Gandhi to write to Imam Bukhari expressing her regret over the cartoons? Why oh why conduct a survey of Muslims in the defence forces, the last and only establishment to have escaped the poison our political class has injected into every single institution?

I don't recall the government or Parliament doing any of this for the many instances of religious insensitivity to singe other faiths, so why single out a case where street power is once again being mobilised?

The govt shud tell the protesters very clearly that, listen, we are deeply sorry for the hurt feelings. But, India has nothing to do with that. You better get along with life. Or else, put those who cause damage to public property or trouble to the pulic behind the bars. Lets enforce the Indian laws if the protests get out of hand rather than stand by and watch meekly.

Murali

Tail piece: I have previously criticised the RSS and Shivsena for their similar anti national activity in pune airport and mumbai coffee shops on valentine's day. Some think that I criticise only the minorities. I can't help if they have a selective amnesia. Answering those will be like killing a mocking bird.

Btb, this topic is like a pendulum. If you think that an increasing amount of hindus have started having this latent feeling about the minorities in general, its because the appeasement has reached a record high. Its like pendulum, it will go to the other side before it comes to a balance.

1 Comments:

At 1:19 AM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

You are absolutely right in saying that Muslims are backward and it is because of their own behaviour and attitudes that they are backward. It is only in Muslim countries that other religions do not have the freedom to even exist while in Christian or Hindu or any other countries, Muslims are free to practice their faith. Sadly, this succumbing to street protests seems to be happening not only in India, but even in USA.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home